Now that IE8’s out, it seems I get to revisit this topic once again, which is getting quite tedious. When Microsoft first began touting IE8 features, I noticed a couple of pages pointing out that they had done a great deal of work to “mitigate” memory leaks in IE. The word “mitigate” sounds a bit fishy, as the source of the problem is pretty fundamental to the design of the COM interface that their script engine uses to access the DOM and other native objects.
As you may recall, IE7 contained a rough attempt to solve this problem by walking the DOM on unload, cleaning up leaks on any elements still there. This helped somewhat, but left many common leak patterns unresolved (in particular, any element removed from the DOM could still leak easily).
From my tests, IE8 appears to have resolved all of the most common leak patterns (as described in the two IE8 links above). In particular, I can’t uncover a single leak that doesn’t at least get cleaned up on unload. This is good news for IE users, because under most circumstances it means that the browser won’t get slow and bloated over time.
How IE8 leaks
With some cursory testing, however, I have uncovered at least one pattern that still leaks memory on IE8. Consider the following code (which you can run here):
This will leak at runtime on IE8. It does get cleaned up when the page is unloaded, but it can still be a serious problem for long-running pages (complex Ajax applications, for example).
This particular example is admittedly somewhat contrived, but it is actually isomorphic to a common use pattern:
- Create an element.
- Attach it to the DOM.
- Create some event handlers that result in circular refs.
- At some point in the future, after the user’s done with it, remove it.
Sounds like a popup, a menu bar, or just about any interactive element that gets created and removed in an application, n’est-ce pas?
What should I do about it?
Honestly, I would advise that you continue to do whatever you always have done. Most Java[script] libraries (GWT, Dojo, jQuery, Prototype, etc.) already have code in place to clean up these sorts of leaks, and they will continue to work as advertised (I’ve personally checked GWT for leaks on IE8). It is unfortunate that we have to continue doing these things, because they have a non-trivial performance cost; and although it’s taken a while, WebKit and Gecko seemed to have finally nailed their own memory leak issues.
Aside: Drip is dead
I wrote Drip some years back in order to help track down memory leaks on Internet Explorer. I incorrectly assumed that it would be useful for a year or two, as the problem would eventually be dealt with by Microsoft.
Well, they did finally deal with the problem, primarily by building their own memory leak detector. The good news is that it works quite well, and is probably much more comprehensive than Drip ever was (and I haven’t had much time to maintain it). The first caveat I would add is that you almost invariably want to change it to report “actual leaks” – I don’t find the IE6 and IE7 options to be useful in practice. The really bad news is that it isn’t useful on IE8 – it will install, but doesn’t catch any actual leaks, as far as I can tell.
Note: I'm moving to G+ comments, but also want to preserve the old blog comments in read-only form. I just haven't gotten around to that last part yet, so they're temporarily unavailable.