So Microsoft (as reported here and here) recently released a “cumulative security update” for IE that fixes its egregious memory leaks. Sounds great. Even if it takes a while to get everybody updated, at least the problem is fixed and we can all stop bending over backwards to work around this problem in our libraries, right.
Not So Fast
Let’s have a look at the actual knowledge-base article to see exactly what it says:
”… a Web page that uses JScript scripting code, a memory leak occurs in Internet Explorer. When you visit a different Web page, the leaked memory is not released.”
So far so good. It even references the original “circular-reference” knowledge-base article, implying that this is indeed what is fixed.
When I saw this article, I nearly spilled tea all over the keyboard. They really fixed this issue? You mean I can untangle all the painful code in GWT that works around this issue, diligently cleaning up all its circular DOM references under all sorts of circumstances?
Settle Down, Beavis
Before I got too excited, I had to do a little gut-check. Did they really go back and make it possible for their garbage collector to chase references through COM objects? That would be wonderful, but I’m not holding my breath.
I put together a little test script to show this in action. Have a look in any version of IE, and watch its spew memory!
I’m With Alex …
… on this one. This is more like a bad joke than anything else. I recognize that fixing IE’s memory leaks is a really complex problem, but the fact that it’s not being done is still more evidence that Microsoft is abandoning IE, at least as far as any real progress is concerned. I just wish they would come out and say it.
In the Meantime
Don’t go ripping out that memory-leak cleanup code. And keep checking for leaks (perhaps with Drip).
Note: I'm moving to G+ comments, but also want to preserve the old blog comments in read-only form. I just haven't gotten around to that last part yet, so they're temporarily unavailable.